Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2022; 28(44): 6294-6309
Published online Nov 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294
Published online Nov 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294
Variables | Fexuprazan 40 mg (n = 116) | Esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 115) | P value | |
Age, yr (mean ± SD)5 | 53.70 ± 12.44 | 55.05 ± 12.89 | 0.343w | |
Sex, n (%)6 | ||||
Men | 78 (67.2) | 74 (64.3) | 0.643c | |
Women | 38 (32.8) | 41 (35.7) | ||
BMI, kg/m2 (SD)5 | 24.42 ± 3.08 | 24.81 ± 3.25 | 0.529w | |
Smoking history, n (%)6 | ||||
Non-smokers | 67 (57.8) | 66 (57.4) | 0.978c | |
Current smokers | 25 (21.6) | 26 (22.6) | ||
Past smokers | 24 (20.7) | 23 (20.0) | ||
Drinking history, n (%)6 | ||||
Non-drinkers | 15 (12.9) | 15 (13.0) | 0.992c | |
Current drinkers | 77 (66.4) | 77 (67.0) | ||
Past drinkers | 24 (20.7) | 23 (20.0) | ||
LA classification1, n (%)6 | ||||
Grade A | 75 (64.7) | 76 (66.1) | 0.630f | |
Grade B | 33 (28.4) | 31 (27.0) | ||
Grade C | 6 (5.2) | 8 (7.0) | ||
Grade D | 2 ( 1.7) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Helicobacter pylori2, n (%)6 | ||||
Positive | 20 (17.4) | 31 (27.2) | 0.075c | |
Negative | 95 (82.6) | 83 (72.8) | ||
CYP2C193, n (%)6 | ||||
EM | 39 (76.5) | 53 (94.6) | 0.007c | |
PM | 12 (23.5) | 3 (5.4) | ||
Severity for heartburn4, n (%)6 | ||||
Mild | 53 (45.7) | 50 (43.5) | 0.735c | |
Moderate/severe | 63 (54.3) | 65 (56.5) |
- Citation: Lee KN, Lee OY, Chun HJ, Kim JI, Kim SK, Lee SW, Park KS, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Kim GH, Sung IK, Park MI, Kwon JG, Kim N, Kim JJ, Lee ST, Kim HS, Kim KB, Lee YC, Choi MG, Lee JS, Jung HY, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Chung H. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(44): 6294-6309
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i44/6294.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294