Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2022; 28(38): 5530-5546
Published online Oct 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i38.5530
Table 2 Application of ultrasound-based artificial intelligence in focal liver lesions
Ref.
Diseases: number of cases
Type of ultrasound
Algorithm of AI
Performance
Xi et al[42]Benign lesions: 300B-mode CNNAll lesions
Accuracy: 84%
Uncertain set of lesions
Malignant lesions: 296Accuracy: 79%
Yang et al[43]Benign tumor: 427B-mode CNNAUC for EV: 0.924
Sensitivity: 86.5%
Malignant tumor: 1786
Specificity: 85.5%
Virmani et al[44]HCC: 27B-mode SVMAccuracy of HCC: 91.6%
Sensitivity
Metastatic liver tumor: 24HCC: 90%
Metastatic liver tumor: 93.3%
Hwang et al[49]Cyst: 29B-mode ANNAccuracy: 96%
Cyst vs hemangioma
Cyst vs malignant
Hemangioma: 37
Hemangioma vs malignant
Malignant: 33
Schmauch et al[50]Non-tumorous liver: 258B-mode CNNAUC
Hemangioma: 17FLL detection: 0.935
Metastasis: 48
HCC: 6
FLL discrimination: 0.916
Cyst: 30
FNH: 8
Tiyarattanachai et al[51]HCC: 2414B-mode CNNDetection rate: 87.0%
Cyst: 6600Sensitivity: 83.9%
Hemangioma: 5374
Specificity: 97.1%
Focal fatty sparing: 5110
Focal fatty infiltration: 934
Gatos et al[47]Benign FLL: 30CEUSSVMAccuracy: 90.3%
Sensitivity: 93.1%
Malignant FLL: 22Specificity: 86.9%
Kondo et al[46]Benign FLL: 31CEUSSVMBenign vs malignant
Accuracy: 91.8%
Sensitivity: 94%
Specificity: 87.1%
Accuracy
Malignant FLL: 67
Benign: 84.4%
HCC: 87.7%
Metastatic liver tumor: 85.7%
Guo et al[48]Benign FLL: 46CEUSDeep canonical correlation analysis and multiple kernel learning Accuracy: 90.4%
Sensitivity: 93.6%
Malignant FLL: 47Specificity: 86.8%
Streba et al[52]HCC: 41CEUSANNTraining accuracy: 94.5%
Hypervascular liver metastasis: 20Testing accuracy: 87.1%
Hypovascular liver metastasis: 12Sensitivity: 93.2%
Specificity: 89.7%
Hemangioma: 16
Focal fatty changes: 23
Căleanu et al[53]HCC: 30CEUSDeep neural network Accuracy: 88%
Hypervascular liver metastasis: 11
Hypovascular liver metastasis: 11
Hemangioma: 23
FNH: 16
Dong et al[56]HCC: 322B-mode RadiomicsAUC: 0.81
Hu et al[57]HCC: 482CEUSRadiomicsAUC: 0.731
Training cohort: 341
Validation cohort: 141
Zhang et al[58]HCC: 313CEUSRadiomicsAUC
Primary cohort: 192Primary dataset: 0.849
Validation cohort: 121Validation dataset: 0.788
Liu et al[63]HCC: 130CEUSDeep learning radiomicsAUC: 0.93
Training cohort: 89
Validation cohort: 41
Ma et al[66]HCC: 318CEUSRadiomicsAUC: 0.89
Training cohort: 255
Validation cohort: 63
Liu et al[69]HCC: 419CEUSDeep learning radiomicsC-index
RFA: 214RFA: 0.726
SR: 0.741
SR: 205