Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2022; 28(37): 5457-5468
Published online Oct 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457
Published online Oct 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457
Table 4 Comparisons of positive endoscopic ultrasonographic features between the pathologically non-low-risk group and low-risk group
| Positive EUS features | Risk classification | ||
| Intermediate/high | Very low/low | P value | |
| Heterogeneous | 0.031 | ||
| Yes | 5 | 62 | |
| No | 3 | 186 | |
| Hyperechoic foci | NS | ||
| Yes | 0 | 22 | |
| No | 8 | 226 | |
| Ulcers | NS | ||
| Yes | 0 | 2 | |
| No | 8 | 246 | |
- Citation: Ge QC, Wu YF, Liu ZM, Wang Z, Wang S, Liu X, Ge N, Guo JT, Sun SY. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(37): 5457-5468
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i37/5457.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457