Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors

doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 28, Issue 37

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6152)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

243

WORD

HTML

2048

Figures (1-3)

458

Tables (1-4)

400

Sum=3212

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

261

Download

799

Sum=1060

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

401

Download

1479

Sum=1880

Oct 7, 2022 (publication date) through Feb 11, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (4)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2022; 28(37): 5457-5468
Published online Oct 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457

Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients

Characteristics	Cases (n = 256)
Age (year)	57.4 ± 8.6
Sex, n (%)
Male	69 (27.0)
Female	187 (73.0)
Tumor location, n (%)
Cardia	6 (2.3)
Fundus	200 (78.1)
Body	44 (17.2)
Antrum	6 (2.4)
Endoscopic resection, n (%)
ESD	136 (53.1)
EFTR	120 (46.9)
Tumor size (cm), n (%)
≤ 1.48	208 (81.3)
>1.48	48 (18.7)
Mitotic index (/50HPF), n (%)
≤ 5	248 (96.9)
> 5	8 (3.1)
Modified NIH classification, n (%)
Very-low	232 (90.6)
Low	16 (6.3)
Intermediate	7 (2.7)
High	1 (0.4)
Positive EUS features, n (%)
Heterogenous	67 (65.1)
Hyperechoic foci	22 (8.6)
Lobular border	1 (0.4)
Ulceration	2 (0.8)

ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EFTR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; HPF: High power field; NIH: National Institute of Health.

Citation: Ge QC, Wu YF, Liu ZM, Wang Z, Wang S, Liu X, Ge N, Guo JT, Sun SY. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(37): 5457-5468
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i37/5457.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5457