Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2022; 28(33): 4890-4908
Published online Sep 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4890
Table 7 GRADE evidence for the effect of Shen-ling-bai-zhu san
Quality assessment






Summary of findings

Importance
No of patients
Effect
Quality
No of studies
Design
Limitations
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Other considerations
RQLQ
Control
Relative (95%CI)
Absolute
Effective rate
14Randomized trialsSerious1Serious2Serious3No serious imprecision4None595/670 (88.8%)459/665 (69%)RR 1.45 (1.22 to 1.37)200 more per 1000 (from 152 more to 255 fewer)Very lowCritical
0.676196 more per 1000 (from 149 fewer to 250 more)
Recurrence rate
3Randomized trialsSerious1Serious2Serious3No serious imprecision4None7/281 (2.5%)31/281 (11%)RR 0.24 (0.11 to 0.55)84 fewer per 1000 (from 50 fewer to 98 fewer)Very lowImportant
0.177135 fewer per 1000 (from 58 fewer to 158 fewer)
HP negative conversion rate
4Randomized trialsNo serious limitations1Very serious2No serious indirections3No serious imprecision4None207/217 (95.4%)170/270 (78.3%)RR 1.2 (1.11 to 1.3)157 more per 1000 (from 86 more to 135 more)ModerateImportant
0.815163 more per 1000 (from 90 more to 244 more)