Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2022; 28(33): 4875-4889
Published online Sep 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875
Published online Sep 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875
Table 4 Reflux esophagitis
Time point | n (%) of Total | Group | P value1 | |
LM-PF, n (%) of Total | POEM, n (%) of Total | |||
Baseline | 1 (2.5) of 40 | 0 (0.0) of 20 | 1 (5.0) of 20 | 1.000 |
1 mo | 5 (13.5) of 37 | 0 (0.0) of 20 | 5 (29.4) of 17 | 0.014 |
6 mo | 11 (32.4) of 34 | 1 (5.6) of 18 | 10 (62.5) of 16 | < 0.001 |
12 mo | 13 (37.1) of 35 | 2 (11.1) of 18 | 11 (64.6) of 17 | 0.002 |
- Citation: de Moura ETH, Jukemura J, Ribeiro IB, Farias GFA, de Almeida Delgado AA, Coutinho LMA, de Moura DTH, Aissar Sallum RA, Nasi A, Sánchez-Luna SA, Sakai P, de Moura EGH. Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(33): 4875-4889
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i33/4875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4875