Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2022; 28(32): 4540-4556
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4540
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4540
Figure 19 Axial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, arterial phase.
A-C: Axial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (A), arterial phase (B) showed an observation measuring almost 20 mm with arterial phase hyperenhancement (arrows) without washout on portal image (C) categorized as LR-4; D and E: On diffusion-weighted imaging (D), the observation showed high signal intensity (arrows) but the ancillary features lacked sufficient specificity for hepatocellular carcinoma to allow for an LR-5 upgrade. After multidisciplinary discussion, ablation was performed (E); F-H: On follow-up, an ablation defect was seen without residual areas of arterial enhancement or washout. This was classified as LR-treatment response non-viable. Note a previous ablation defect in the right lobe (arrows).
- Citation: Liava C, Sinakos E, Papadopoulou E, Giannakopoulou L, Potsi S, Moumtzouoglou A, Chatziioannou A, Stergioulas L, Kalogeropoulou L, Dedes I, Akriviadis E, Chourmouzi D. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: A pictorial minireview. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(32): 4540-4556
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i32/4540.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4540