Anoctamin 5 regulates the cell cycle and affects prognosis in gastric cancer

doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4649

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 28, Issue 32

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4445)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

214

WORD

HTML

2095

Figures (1-6)

402

Tables (1-6)

416

Sum=3189

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

281

Download

975

Sum=1256

Aug 28, 2022 (publication date) through Feb 8, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2022; 28(32): 4649-4667
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4649

Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors associated with 5-year overall survival

Variables	N	Univariate		Multivariate
Variables	N	5-yr OS rate (%)	P value	HR (95%CI)	P value
Total	195
Sex
Male	128	87.9	0.3274
Female	67	85.3	0.3274
Age
< 65	77	89.7	0.4113
65	118	85.2	0.4113
Location
U	41	80.9	0.2629
M, L	154	88.6	0.2629
Tumor length (mm)
< 30	63	97.8	0.0020^a	3.010 (0.347-26.12)	0.3176
30	132	80.1	0.0020^a
Histological type
tub1, tub2, pap	96	88.3	0.4544
por, sig, muc	99	85.6	0.4544
Lymphatic invasion
Negative	110	96.1	0.0002^a	1.872 (0.549-6.384)	0.3166
Positive	85	75.7	0.0002^a
Venous invasion
Negative	131	90.6	0.0126^a	1.085 (0.476-2.472)	0.8469
Positive	64	79.3	0.0126^a
pT
pT1-2	137	95.9	< 0.0001^a	5.240 (1.807-15.20)	0.0023^c
pT3-4	58	65.5	< 0.0001^a
pN
pN0	139	94.1	< 0.0001^a	2.148 (0.695-6.643)	0.1844
pN1-3	56	67.6	< 0.0001^a
IHC score
< 1.3	137	89.6	0.0104^a	2.318 (1.016-5.288)	0.0457^c
1.3	58	73.9	0.0104^a

^aP < 0.05: Log-rank test.

^cP < 0.05: Cox hazard regression analysis.

CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio; IHC: Immunohistochemical; L: Lower; M: Middle; muc: Mucinous adenocarcinoma; OS: Overall survival; pap: Papillary adenocarcinoma; pN: Pathological N stage; por: Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; pT: Pathological T stage; sig: Signet-ring cell carcinoma; tub: Tubular adenocarcinoma; U: Upper.

Citation: Fukami T, Shiozaki A, Kosuga T, Kudou M, Shimizu H, Ohashi T, Arita T, Konishi H, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Fujiwara H, Okamoto K, Kishimoto M, Morinaga Y, Konishi E, Otsuji E. Anoctamin 5 regulates the cell cycle and affects prognosis in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(32): 4649-4667
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i32/4649.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4649