Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2022; 28(32): 4557-4573
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4557
Published online Aug 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4557
Study population | Methods | Outcomes | Ref. |
RCT included 24 pts with ALC and biopsy proven ASH1 | Group A (13 pts) received SMT + G-CSF and group B (11 pts) received SMT only | Higher increase in CD34+ cell count, HGF, proliferating HPCs and Ki67+/cytokeratin 7+ staining in group A | Spahr et al[27], 2008 |
RCT included 27 pts with ALC presenting with ACLF1 | Group A (15 pts) received G-CSF + SMT, and group B (12 pts) received placebo + SMT | Group A had higher median leukocyte and neutrophil counts after 1 w and higher CD34+ cell count after 1 mo, together with improvement in 60-day survival, reduced CTP, MELD and SOFA scores | Garg et al[28], 2012 |
RCT included 46 pts with severe AH1 | Group A (23 pts) received G-CSF, while group B (23 pts) received SMT | In group A, higher CD34+ count was observed together with marked CTP, MELD and mDF score improvements after 1, 2 and 3 mo and higher survival rate at 90 d | Singh et al[29], 2014 |
RCT included 38 pts with ALC1 | Group A (14 pts) received SMT + GH qd for 12 mo + initial G-CSF 5-d treatment and then 4 G-CSF cycles every 3 mo; group B (15 pts) received initial G-CSF 5-d treatment and then 4 G-CSF cycles every 3 mo, and group C received SMT only | Groups A and B had better TFS after 12 mo and higher QOL scores, as well as higher CD34+ mobilization rate at day 6, with lower incidence of sepsis and SBP | Verma et al[36], 2018 |
RCT included 35 pts with ALC1 | Group A (19 pts) received G-CSF + EPO and group B (16 pts) received G-CSF only | Group A had higher improvement of CTP and MELD score, together with lower incidence of AKI, HE and ascites; histologically number of CD163+ macrophages and KI67+ index were increased | Anand et al[33], 2019 |
RCT included 57 pts with severe AH1 | Group A (18 pts) received SMT + G-CSF, group B (19 pts) received SMT + G-CSF + NAC, and group C (20 pts) received SMT alone | Pts in group A and B had higher 90-d survival rate; in group A, improvement in mDF was observed at mo 1, 2 and 3, together with reduction in MELD score after 3 mo | Singh et al[37], 2018 |
RCT included 28 pts with severe AH1 | Group A (14 pts) received G-CSF and group B (14 pts) received placebo | Group A had better MELD score, lower incidence of infections as well as lower 90-d mortality | Shasthry et al[38], 2019 |
RCT included 48 pts with ALC1 | Group A (25 pts) was treated with 4 cycles of 5-d G-CSF therapy and group B (23 pts) was treated with SMT only | Group A had higher CD34+ and neutrophil count at day 6; higher 1-year survival, amelioration in CTP and MELD scores together with better ascites control and lower infection risk were observed after 12 mo | De et al[30], 2021 |
RCT included 176 pts with ACLF precipitated by alcohol consumption1 | Group A (88 pts) was treated with G-CSF + SMT, and group B (88 pts) was treated with SMT | There were no statistically significant differences in respect of TFS, 90-d and 360-d survival rates and infection incidence | Engelmann et al[39], 2021 |
- Citation: Virovic-Jukic L, Ljubas D, Stojsavljevic-Shapeski S, Ljubičić N, Filipec Kanizaj T, Mikolasevic I, Grgurevic I. Liver regeneration as treatment target for severe alcoholic hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(32): 4557-4573
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i32/4557.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i32.4557