Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2022; 28(29): 3960-3970
Published online Aug 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3960
Figure 4
Figure 4 Case presentation. A: A 56-year-old man with upper RC, the nodule of TDs (size: 24 mm × 16 mm) had an irregular shape; B: A 44-year-old man with lower RC, the nodule of TDs (size: 14 mm × 11 mm) had a regular oval shape. It is difficult to distinguish TDs and LNM from conventional imaging findings. For these two patients, Rad-score of the largest peritumoral nodule achieved correct diagnosis (values = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively). RC: Rectal cancer; TDs: Tumor deposits; LNM: Lymph node metastasis.