Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2022; 28(28): 3573-3585
Published online Jul 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3573
Published online Jul 28, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3573
Study name | Design | Experimental arm | Median overall survival, mo | Response rate- RECIST, % | Grade 3 - 4 treatment-related adverse events |
IMBRAVE 150[21] | Phase III; First-line | Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab | 19.2 | 30% | 36% |
KEYNOTE 524/Study 116[22] | Phase Ib; First-line | Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib | 22 | 36% | 67% |
REG-PEMBRO-HCC[23] | Phase Ib; First-line | Pembrolizumab + Regorafenib | 26.5 | 32% | 86% |
CHECKMATE 040[24] | Phase II; Second-line | Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (arm A) | 22.8 | 32% | 53% |
STUDY 22[27] | Phase II; Second-line | Durvalumab + Tremelimumab | 18.7 | 24% | 35.1% |
CHECKMATE-040[25] | Phase II; First and second-line | Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Cabozantinib | Not-reached | 26% | 71% |
- Citation: da Fonseca LG, Araujo RLC. Combination approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma: How systemic treatment can benefit candidates to locoregional modalities. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(28): 3573-3585
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i28/3573.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3573