Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2022; 28(27): 3514-3523
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514
Table 2 Rates of clinical and technical success in the included studies
Ref. | Technical success | Clinical success | ||
EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy | Percutaneous transhepatic biliarydrainage | EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy | Percutaneous transhepatic biliarydrainage | |
Artifon et al[23] | 13/13 | 12/12 | 13/13 | 12/12 |
Bapaye et al[24] | 23/25 | 26/26 | 23/25 | 26/26 |
Khashab et al[25] | 19/22 | 51/51 | 19/19 | 47/51 |
Giovannini[26] | 19/20 | 17/17 | 18/19 | 17/17 |
Jung et al[27] | 32/34 | 31/32 | 28/32 | 27/31 |
Sharaiha et al[28] | 43/47 | 12/13 | 27/43 | 3/12 |
- Citation: Hassan Z, Gadour E. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3514-3523
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i27/3514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514