Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2022; 28(27): 3514-3523
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the studies
Ref. | Artifon et al[23] | Bapaye et al[24] | Khashab et al[25] | Giovannini[26] | Jung et al[27] | Sharaiha et al[28] |
Type of study (country) | Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial(Brazil) | Single-center, retrospective, comparative study (India) | Single-center, retrospective, comparative, cohort study (United States) | Multicenter, randomized, phase II trial (France) | Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial (South Korea) | Single-center, retrospective, cohort review (United States) |
Age [mean (SD)/median ± SD], yr | 63.4 (11.1) vs 71.0 (11.9) | 59.9 ± 13.3 vs 62.4 ± 10.2 | 64.9 ± 12.5 vs 66.9 ± 12.5 | N/A | 66.5 vs 68.4 | 68.7 ± 13.9 vs 58.8 ± 13.6 |
Males/females | 2.25 vs 2.0 | 1.08 vs 1.6 | 1.2 vs 1.31 | 0.91 vs 9 | 3.25 vs 3 | 12 vs 1.47 |
Comorbidity/quality index (mean) | 58.3 vs 57.8 (QoL sF 36) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 40.7 vs 40.5 (global health status/QoL) | 5.9 vs 6.4 (Charleston comorbidity index) |
Total bilirubin (mean), mg/dL | 16.4 vs 17.2 | 7.11 ± 7.6 vs 9.41 ± 12.4 | 15.8 ± 11.3 vs 14.5 ± 8.8 | N/A | 10.4 vs 11.8 | N/A |
Mean diameter of bile duct | 13.7 vs 11.9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.22 vs 12.6 | N/A |
Etiology of obstruction | ||||||
Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic | 10 vs 6 | 15 vs 18 | 43 | N/A | 12 vs 12 | 22 |
Advanced lymphoma/liposarcoma | 0 vs 1 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 0 | 0 |
Cholangiocarcinoma | 1 vs 1 | 2 vs 2 | 12 | N/A | 7 vs 14 | 9 |
Duodenal carcinoma | 0 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 3 vs 0 | 5 |
Gall bladder cancer | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 5 vs 5 | 0 |
Gastric carcinoma | 0 vs 1 | 0 | 1 | N/A | 3 vs 2 | 4 |
Metastasis | 0 vs 3 | 0 | 12 | N/A | 3 vs 1 | 7 |
Plasmacytoma | 1 vs 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | 0 | 0 |
Total malignancy | 0 | 37 | N/A | |||
Reason for ERCP failure | ||||||
Altered anatomy | 1 | 9 | 0 | N/A | 12 vs 10 | N/A |
Duodenal/stomach invasion | 8 | 32 | 0 | N/A | 22 vs 22 | N/A |
Indwelling duodenal stent | 0 | 16 | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
Unable to cannulate | 16 | 42 | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
- Citation: Hassan Z, Gadour E. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3514-3523
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i27/3514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3514