Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488
Table 6 Diagnostic statistics of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classes for different diagnosis
Tested association
Sensitivity (%)          
Specificity (%)          
PPV (%)                
NPV (%)                
Diagnostic accuracy (%)
Youden’s index
Odds Ratio
P value
CEUS LR M-ICC91.3 (72.0-98.9)96.7 (94.7-98.1)56.8 (39.5-72.9)99.6 (98.5-99.9)96.5 (94.5-97.9)0.880309.75< 0.001
CEUS LR 5-HCC67.6 (62.9-72.1)97.7 (92.0-99.7)99.3 (97.5-99.9)38.6 (32.1-45.3)72.8 (68.7-76.6)0.65389.80< 0.001
CEUS LR 4-HCC26.2 (22.1-30.7)96.6 (90.4-99.3)97.4 (92.5-99.5)21.4 (17.5-25.8)38.4 (34.1-42.7)0.22810.10< 0.001
CEUS LR 4/5-HCC93.9 (91.1-95.9)94.3 (87.2-98.1)98.8 (97.1-99.6)76.1 (67.0-83.8)93.9 (91.5-95.8)0.882253.50< 0.001
CEUS LR 3-benign lesion79.7 (67.2-89.0)95.8 (93.5-97.5)71.2 (58.7-81.7)97.3 (95.3-98.6)93.9 (91.5-95.8)0.75589.26< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-malignancy4.2 (2.5-6.5)20.3 (11.0-32.8)28.8 (18.3-41.3)2.7 (1.4-4.7)6.0 (4.2-8.5)-0.7550.01< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-iso-iso-malignancy5.3 (0.1-26.0)19.1 (9.1-33.3)2.6 (0.1-13.5)33.3 (16.5-54.0)15.2 (7.5-26.1)-0.7560.01< 0.001
CEUS LR-3-hypo-hypo-malignancy57.9 (33.5-79.7)91.5 (79.6-97.6)73.3 (44.9-92.2)84.3 (71.4-93.0)81.8 (70.4-90.2)0.49414.78< 0.001

  • Citation: Vidili G, Arru M, Solinas G, Calvisi DF, Meloni P, Sauchella A, Turilli D, Fabio C, Cossu A, Madeddu G, Babudieri S, Zocco MA, Iannetti G, Di Lembo E, Delitala AP, Manetti R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i27/3488.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488