Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2022; 28(26): 3218-3231
Published online Jul 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i26.3218
Published online Jul 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i26.3218
Table 2 Percentage of patients who changed body mass index groups after ascites correction
| Reduction in BMI after ascites correction | Original/uncorrected | Unchanged | ||||
| Underweight | Normal | Overweight | Obesity 1 | Obesity 2 | ||
| Underweight, 2 (1.1%) | 2 (100%) | |||||
| 5 (22.73%) | Normal, 22 (12.5%) | 17 (77.27%) | ||||
| 29 (55.77%) | Overweight, 52 (29.55%) | 23 (44.23%) | ||||
| 1 (1.82%) | 42 (76.36%) | Obesity 1, 55 (31.25%) | 12 (21.82%) | |||
| 17 (62.96%) | Obesity 2, 27 (15.34%) | 10 (37.04%) | ||||
| 2 (11.11%) | 11 (61.11%) | Obesity 3, 18 (10.23%) | 5 (27.78%) | |||
| All BMI group had some level of decrease after correctionEspecially higher BMI groups have more % reduction | Total (n = 176) | % of unchanged are higher among low BMI groups | ||||
- Citation: Qazi-Arisar FA, Uchila R, Chen C, Yang C, Chen SY, Karnam RS, Azhie A, Xu W, Galvin Z, Selzner N, Lilly L, Bhat M. Divergent trajectories of lean vs obese non-alcoholic steatohepatitis patients from listing to post-transplant: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(26): 3218-3231
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i26/3218.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i26.3218