Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2022; 28(23): 2609-2624
Published online Jun 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i23.2609
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of the best magnetic resonance imaging histogram derived parameters to detect responder patients

Cutoff
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
Accuracy
AUC (95%CI)
∆%kurtosis11.85%94.4%96.7%94.4%96.7%96.0%0.991 (0.925-1.000)
Post-nCRT kurtosis0.7893.3%99.0%90%99.0%96.0%0.985 (0.957-1.000)
∆skewness0.1666.7%99.0%64.3%99.0%79.2%0.885 (0.795-0.975)
Post-nCRT skewness1.5963.3%99.0%62.0%99.0%77.1%0.815 (0.795-0.634)
Post-nCRT ADC10th0.34×10-3 mm2/s66.7%73.3%60.0%79.0%71.0%0.681 (0.509-0.852)
∆%ADCmean56.00%56.0%77.0%56.0%73.3%66.7%0.686 (0.500-0.820
∆%ADC10th74.21%61.1%70.0%55.0%75.0%66.7%0.589 (0.483-0.815)
ROI ∆%ADCmean55.00%61.0%69.0%52.0%72.0%65.3%0.583 (0.425-0.715)