Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2022; 28(19): 2137-2147
Published online May 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137
Published online May 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137
Scenario | Rule | If family history of CRC (first-degree relative) | |
Surveillance interval recommendation based on 2012 guidelines, yr | |||
1 | No polyp | 10 | 5 |
2 | 1–2 diminutive polyps (largest polyp max 5 mm) | 10 | 5 |
3 | 1–3 small polyps (all polyps 1–9 mm and the largest polyp max < 10 mm) | 5 | 5 |
4 | ≥ 4 polyps, any size | Follow-up pathology results | - |
5 | At least 1 polyp ≥ 10 mm | Follow-up pathology results | - |
6 | Insufficient or inadequate bowel preparation | 1 | - |
7 | Unclear | - | - |
Surveillance interval recommendation based on 2020 guidelines, yr | |||
1 | No polyp | 10 | 5 |
2 | 1–3 diminutive polyps; or 2 diminutive polyps and 1 small polyp | 10 | 5 |
3 | 1–2 small polyps exclusively | 10 | 5 |
4 | > 3 polyps, any size, or > 2 polyps 6–9 mm | Follow-up pathology results | – |
5 | ≥ 1 polyp ≥ 10 mm | Follow-up pathology results | – |
6 | Insufficient or inadequate bowel preparation | 1 | 1 |
- Citation: Taghiakbari M, Hammar C, Frenn M, Djinbachian R, Pohl H, Deslandres E, Bouchard S, Bouin M, von Renteln D. Non-optical polyp-based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(19): 2137-2147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i19/2137.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137