Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2022; 28(15): 1548-1562
Published online Apr 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i15.1548
Table 1 Clinical and endoscopic features of the patients according to the presence of lymph node metastasis
VariablesLNM- (n = 73)LNM+ (n = 14)P value
Age at diagnosis, yr (median, IQR)47.0 (41.0-52.0)43.5 (37.0-51.0)0.276
Lesion size, cm (median, IQR) 1.5 (1.2-1.7) 1.5 (1.3-1.8) 0.485
Male, n (%)25 (34.2)4 (28.6)0.918
Longitudinal location, n (%) 0.269
Upper4 (5.5)0 (0.0)
Middle22 (30.1)2 (14.3)
Lower 47 (64.4)12 (85.7)
Cross-sectional circumference, n (%)0.421
Anterior wall16 (21.9)6 (42.9)
Great curvature 16 (21.9)2 (14.3)
Posterior wall 23 (31.5)3 (21.4)
Lesser curvature 18 (24.7)3 (21.4)
Gross type, n (%) 0.440
Depressed42 (57.5)10 (71.4)
Flat 25 (34.2)4 (28.6)
Elevated 6 (8.2)0 (0.0)
Number of retrieved LNs (median, IQR)30.0 (25.0-37.0)30.5 (25.5-37.0)0.862
Endoscopic appearances, n (%)
Exudate6 (8.2)1 (7.1)> 0.999
Endoscopic ulcer 30 (41.1)7 (50.0)0.747
Converging fold 11 (15.1)1 (7.1)0.715
Tumor island 14 (19.2)3 (21.4)> 0.999