Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2022; 28(15): 1508-1525
Published online Apr 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i15.1508
Table 3 Proteins associated with poor outcome in cholangiocarcinoma patients
Protein
Comparison
Outcome
Ref.
Tissue
CDH17CCA (n = 180)High CDH17 was associated with a worse OS and recurrence-free survival[64]
HHLA2iCCA (n = 218) meta-analysisHigh HHLA2 expression was significantly associated with shorter OS[74]
KL-6 CCA (n = 21), cHCC-CCA (n = 12), HCC (n = 78)A key molecule for tumor cell adhesion and invasion[63]
KLK11CCA and adjacent normal tissues (n = 18)OS of CCA patients with a high expression of KLK11 was significantly shorter than those with a low expression of KLK11 (414 d vs 809 d, respectively; P = 0.048)[65]
LC3cHCC-CC (n = 40)The 5-yr OS and disease-free survival rates were 61.2% and 74.6% in high LC3 expression patients and 0% and 0% in those with low LC3 expression[70]
MMP-7Perihilar iCCA, hCCA, and eCCA (n = 66)Patients with moderate to marked expression of MMP-7 had a significantly poorer prognosis, as compared to those with negative to focal expression[72]
iCCA (n = 35)The 5-yr survival rates of MMP-7(+) and MMP-7(−) patients were 72.7% and 18.3%, respectively[73]
PD-L1 CCA (n = 2012) meta-analysisOverexpression of PD-L1 was significantly associated with worse OS[17]
S100PCCA (n = 1925) meta-analysisS100 calcium binding protein P overexpression was associated with poor OS[69]
uPaiCCA (n = 174)High uPa expression was correlated with lymphatic invasion and metastasis of CCA patients[71]
uPARCCA (n = 108) vs normal tissue (n = 108)The median OS was 890 d for patients with uPAR positive vs 1.321 d for patients with uPAR negative[59]
Biomarker panel: CEA, AFP, and Ki67iCCA (n = 92)higher AFP, CEA, and Ki67, as well as more advanced TNM staging were associated with worse OS[75]
Serum
CIAPIN1CCA (n = 159) vs HC (n = 93)Higher CIAPIN1 level was significantly associated with shorter OS time[66]
DKK1 + CA19-9iCCA (n = 79) vs HC (n = 160)DKK-1 in combination with CA19-9 showed a better diagnostic performance than CA19-9 alone; low DKK-1 and CA19-9 were associated with longer OS[60]
MUC5ACCCA (n = 49), benign BTD (n = 23), HC (n = 16)High MUC5AC level was related to a worse prognosis compared with patients with lower levels, with 3-yr survival rates of 21.5% and 59.3%, respectively[55]
OPNCCA (n = 107) vs HC (n = 55)Poor postoperative survival[50]
OPN/tumor volumeiCCA (n = 124) Low circulating OPN per tumor volume was associated with shorter OS and disease-free survival[77]
PD-L1CCA (n = 73) vs HC (n = 42)Low PD-L1 levels displayed a strong trend towards an impaired prognosis[76]
S100A6CCA (n = 112) vs HC (n = 42)S100A6 potential was like those of the clinically established biomarkers CEA and CA19-9[67]
uPARCCA (n = 168)Baseline level of uPAR was an independent predictor of survival; a high level of uPAR after 2 cycles of chemotherapy was associated with poor survival[68]
CCA (n = 117), HC (n = 76)Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed circulating uPAR levels as an independent prognostic marker following biliary tract cancer resection[59]
Biomarker panel: S100A9, MUC5AC, TGF-β1, Ang-2, and CA19-9CCA (n = 40), and non-CCA patients (n = 40) and HC (n = 40)TGF-β1 and Ang-2 are predictors of higher TNM stages[62]