Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2022; 28(13): 1347-1361
Published online Apr 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1347
Published online Apr 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1347
Table 2 Comparison of three models in primary training, internal validation, and external validation sets
Primary training set | Internal validation set | External validation set | ||||
C-index (95%CI) | P value | C-index (95%CI) | P value | C-index (95%CI) | P value | |
Full model | 0.701 (0.655-0.746) | Ref. | 0.684 (0.619-0.748) | Ref. | 0.672 (0.609-0.734) | Ref. |
Clinical-model | 0.629 (0.578-0.681) | 0.000 | 0.593 (0.531-0.655) | 0.009 | 0.589 (0.514-0.663) | 0.014 |
TNM stage | 0.638 (0.576-0.699) | 0.013 | 0.552 (0.462-0.641) | 0.011 | 0.560 (0.462-0.657) | 0.033 |
- Citation: Zhang DY, Ku JW, Zhao XK, Zhang HY, Song X, Wu HF, Fan ZM, Xu RH, You D, Wang R, Zhou RX, Wang LD. Increased prognostic value of clinical–reproductive model in Chinese female patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(13): 1347-1361
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i13/1347.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i13.1347