Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2021; 27(4): 358-370
Published online Jan 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i4.358
Table 3 Biliary cleanliness before and after saline irrigation, assessed by logistic regression analysis


Residual massive stones (score = 1) before saline irrigation

Biliary clearance (score = 5) after 100 mL saline irrigation

n/N
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
n/N
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis






OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value

OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age
≤ 65 yr6/271.0019/2719/271.00-
> 65 yr7/201.89 (0.52-6.86)0.3413/2013/200.78 (0.23-2.69) 0.70--
Gender-
Female9/241.0016/2416/241.00-
Male4/230.35 (0.09-1.37)0.1316/230.1716/231.14 (0.34-3.90)0.83--
CBD diameter
≤ 15 mm5/321.0026/3226/321.001.00
> 15 mm8/156.17 (1.53-24.84) 0.016/150.0346/150.15 (0.04-0.60) 0.0070.08 (0.01-0.49)0.007
Stone number
Single3/111.0010/1110/111.001.00
Multiple10/361.03 (0.23-4.66) 0.9722/36-22/360.16 (0.02-1.37)0.090.08 (0.01-1.09)0.06
Stone diameter
≤ 15 mm8/361.0026/3626/361.00-
> 15 mm5/112.92 (0.70-12.11) 0.146/110.346/110.46 (0.12-1.86) 0.28--
Pigment-based stones
No4/171.0014/1714/171.001.00
Yes9/301.39 (0.36-5.46) 0.6318/30-18/300.32 (0.08-1.36)0.120.43 (0.05-3.60)0.44
PAD
No4/151.0026/3226/321.001.00
Yes9/321.08 (0.27-4.28)0.926/15-6/156.50 (1.67-25.38) 0.0076.51 (1.08-39.21)0.041