Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2021; 27(38): 6357-6373
Published online Oct 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6357
Published online Oct 14, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6357
Strengths | Disadvantages | |
Plastic stents | Easy placement, removal, and exchange; Cost-effective for use < 4 mo; Variety of shapes and sizes | Tendency for stent occlusion after several months |
Uncovered self-expandable metal stents (USEMS) | Long stent patency due to large luminal diameter; Stent malposition is rare | Cost-effective for use > 4 mo; High risk for tissue ingrowth or tumor overgrowth; Risk for duodenal wall erosion; Biliary leakage possible; Difficult to reposition or remove |
Partially covered self-expandable metal stents (PCSEMS) | Long stent patency due to large luminal diameter; Biliary leakage is rare | Cost-effective for use > 4 mo; Intermediate risk for tissue ingrowth or tumor overgrowth; Risk for duodenal wall erosion; Difficult to reposition or remove; Side branch obstruction possible |
Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) | Long stent patency due to large luminal diameter, covering inhibits tissue/tumor in-growth through mesh; No biliary leakage | Cost-effective for use > 4 mo; Risk for duodenal wall erosion; Difficult to reposition or remove; High risk of stent migration; Side branch obstruction possible |
- Citation: Lam R, Muniraj T. Fully covered metal biliary stents: A review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(38): 6357-6373
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i38/6357.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6357