Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2021; 27(37): 6231-6247
Published online Oct 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231
Published online Oct 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231
Guideline/Consensus group | Recommendation |
AGA[18,19] | Active IBD with anti-TNF → suggest use of reactive TDM |
Quiescent IBD with anti-TNF → not recommended | |
Inflammatory bowel disease Sydney/Australian Inflammatory bowel disease consensus working group (2017)[20] | Use of TDM preferred in (1) Upon suspected treatment failure; (2) Following successful induction; and (3) When completed drug holiday |
For those in clinical remission, consider TDM periodically only if it will change management | |
British guidelines (2019)[21] | Good practice recommendation → ALL IBD patients should be reviewed 2-4 wk post loading dose to assess response and check drug levels and anti-drug antibodies |
Use of serum drug trough & anti-drug antibody concentrations to be incorporated when deciding in change of therapy (dose escalation vs switch to other anti-TNF drug or out of class change) | |
ECCO (2020)[22] | CD in remission on anti-TNF → insufficient evidence to recommend FOR or AGAINST TDM |
CD patients who have lost response → insufficient evidence |
- Citation: Albader F, Golovics PA, Gonczi L, Bessissow T, Afif W, Lakatos PL. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: The dawn of reactive monitoring. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(37): 6231-6247
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i37/6231.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231