Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2021; 27(37): 6231-6247
Published online Oct 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231
Published online Oct 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231
Ref. | Study design; n | Population studied | Type of intervention | Primary outcome | Results |
Vande Casteele et al[16], 2015 (Proactive) | Prospective single center study RCT, n = 263 | Adults with mod to severe UC responders to infliximab (IFX) | IFX. Target 3-7 μg/mL during maintenance phase. Clinical vs concentration-based dose escalation | Clinical and biochemical remission | Fewer flares in concentration-based group. No difference in remission rates at 1 yr |
Papamichael et al[73], 2017 (Proactive) | Retrospective multi-center RCT, n = 264 | Adults with CD + UC | IFX 5-10 μg/mL | Treatment failureNeed for IBD related hospitalization or surgery. Adverse events | Proactive was associated with better clinical outcomes, including greater drug durability, less need for IBD-related surgery or hospitalization |
Perinbasekar et al[74], 2017 (Proactive) | Retrospective single center study, n = 127 | Adult IBD patients initiating treatment with either IFX or adalimumab (Ada) | IFX target ≥ 3 μg/mL; Ada target ≥ 5 μg/mL | Clinical response at 1 yr. Endoscopic response. Persistence with anti-TNF at 1 yr | Persistence with therapy and clinical and endoscopic response were superior for proactive compared to control patients treated with infliximab |
Bernardo et al[75], 2017 (Proactive) | Retrospective single center study, n = 117 | Adult IBD patients on treatment with infliximab | Clinical based vs proactive TDM. (1) Target IFX CD 3-7 μg/mL; (2) Target IFX UC 5-10 μg/mL; (3) Target Ada CD 5-7 μg/mL; and (4) Target Ada UC 7-9 μg/mL | At 48 wk (1) Clinical remission; (2) Rates of hospitalizations; (3) Rates of surgery; and (4) Therapeutic failure | No difference noted in relation to outcomes. Higher rates of drug escalation in proactive group. Longer period of remission in proactive group |
D’Haens et al[12], 2018 (Proactive) | Prospective multi-center RCT, n = 122 | Adults with mod to severe luminal CD biologic naïve on infliximab maintenance | Dose escalation using combined approach of clinical + TDM vs symptom-based approach. IFX target > 3 μg/mL during maintenance phase | Sustained steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 22-54 and mucosal healing at week 54 | No difference in terms of rates of steroid-free remission |
Papamichael et al[10], 2018 (Proactive vs reactive) | Retrospective multicenter study, n = 102 | Adult IBD patients on infliximab | Reactive TDM followed by subsequent proactive TDM vs reactive testing IFX target 5-10 μg/mL | Treatment failure. IBD related hospitalization and surgery | Proactive monitoring after reactive testing associated with greater drug persistence and fever IBD related hospitalizations |
Papamichael et al[11], 2019 (Proactive) | Retrospective multicenter study, n = 382 | IBD patients on maintenance therapy with adalimumab | Proactive vs reactive TDM. Ada > 10 μg/mL | Treatment failure | Proactive associated with lower risk of treatment failure |
Assa et al[14], 2019 (Proactive) | Prospective multi-center RCT, n = 78 | Ages 6-17 yr with CD with response to adalimumab | Ada target trough levels ≥ 5 μg/mL | Sustained steroid-free clinical remission (weeks 8-72) | Higher rates of steroid free clinical remission in proactive group |
Strik et al[76], 2019 (Proactive) | Retrospective multi-center RCT, n = 80 | UC + CD in clinical remission on infliximab maintenance therapy | Dashboard driven dose escalation with TDM vs non TDM. IFX level > 3 μg/mL | Clinical remission | Dashboard-guided dosing resulted in a significant higher proportion of patients who maintained clinical remission during 1 yr of treatment |
Danese et al[70], 2020 (Proactive) | Prospective multi-center RCT, n = 184 | Clinical responders from induction phase of SERENE-CD | Clinical based group vs proactive TDM (TL 5-10 μg/mL) adalimumab every week or every other week | Clinical remission and endoscopic response and remission at 1 yr | No difference in terms of clinical end points |
Fernandes et al[15], 2020 (Proactive) | Prospective study, n = 205 | IBD patients completing infliximab induction therapy | Prospective arm (TDM-based dose escalation) vs retrospective arm (non-TDM). IFX levels 3-7 μg/mL CD; IFX levels 5-10 μg/mL UC | Need for surgery, hospital admission, treatment endrates of mucosal healing at 2 yr of treatment | Proactive TDM associated with fewer surgeries and higher rates of mucosal healing |
Bossuyt et al[71], 2020 (Proactive vs reactive) | Prospective multi-center RCT | All IBD patients on infliximab therapy > week 14 | Using point of care testing at the time of infusion > proactive vs reactive TDM | Clinical remissionDiscontinuation of infliximab. Composite end points of IBD related hospitalizations and surgeries, change of treatment | No difference in terms of rate of clinical remission or treatment discontinuationUltra-proactive not superior to reactive |
Afif et al[67], 2010 (Reactive) | Retrospective study, n =155 | IBD patients who had infliximab | Measurements of human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACAs) and infliximab concentrations | Loss of response. Change in treatment | Measurement of both antibody and drug levels lead to improved response |
Steenholdt et al[66], 2014 (Reactive) | Prospective RCT, n = 69 | CD patients failing on infliximab therapy | Infliximab intensification vs algorithm defined using TDM | Clinical and economic outcomes at week 20 | Lower healthcare costs in algorithm-based group. Similar rates of clinical response and remission |
Kelly et al[63], 2017 (Reactive) | Retrospective study, n = 312 | Primary responders on infliximab who underwent dose escalation | TDM vs clinical based dose escalation of infliximab | Endoscopic remissionClinical response | Higher rates of endoscopic remission with TDM |
Pouillon et al[77], 2018 (Reactive) | Retrospective single center study, n = 226 | IBD patients who completed maintenance phase of TAXIT | Clinical based vs trough concentration-based dosing of infliximab, infliximab level 3-7 μg/mL | IBD related hospitalization and surgery. Steroid use. Mucosal healing | Similar rates of mucosal healing in both groups. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation in clinic-based group |
- Citation: Albader F, Golovics PA, Gonczi L, Bessissow T, Afif W, Lakatos PL. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: The dawn of reactive monitoring. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(37): 6231-6247
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i37/6231.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6231