Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2021; 27(32): 5306-5321
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i32.5306
Table 3 Key characteristics of the main studies using radiomics and machine learning algorithms on magnetic resonance images to predict outcome other than pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Ref.
Study design (n of sites)
Number of patients
Prediction task
CT phase (n of CT scanner)
Segmentation method
ML algorithm
Data powering algorithm
Validation
Performance
Bibault et al[85], 2018Retrospective (3)99pCR after nCRTUnenhanced (3)Manual – 3DDNNRadiomics and clinical featuresInternal validation (cross-validation)AUC: 0.72
Hamerla et al[86], 2019Retrospective (1)169pCR after nCRTUnenhanced (1)Manual – 3DRFRadiomics featuresInternal validation (cross-validation)Accuracy: 0.87
Yuan et al[87], 2020Retrospective (1)91pCR after nCRTUnenhanced (1)Manual – 3DRFRadiomics featuresInternal validation (train/validation split)Accuracy: 0.84
Wu et al[90], 2019 Retrospective (1)102MSI statusVenous phase - DECT (2)Manual - 3 2D ROIs for lesionLRRadiomics featuresInternal validation (train/validation /test split)AUC: 0.87
Fan et al[91], 2019Retrospective (1)100MSI statusPortal venous phase (2) Semiautomatic – 3DNBRadiomics featuresInternal validation (cross-validation)AUC: 0.75
Wu et al[92], 2020Retrospective (1)173KRAS mutationPortal venous phase (3)Manual + DL – single 2D ROILRRadiomics featuresInternal validation (train/test split)C-index: 0.83
Wang et al[94], 2019Retrospective (1)411Prediction of survivalUnenhanced (1)Manual – 3D10-F CVRadiomics and clinical featuresInternal validation (cross-validation)C-index: 0.73