Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2021; 27(3): 281-293
Published online Jan 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.281
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of computer-assisted detection systems vs endoscopists
CAD systems
Endoscopists
CAD-NBI
CAD-WLI
All, n = 20
Experienced, n = 4
Mid-level, n = 8
Junior, n = 8
Sensitivity, % (95%CI)91.098.573.9 (68.1-79.7)94.7 (85.0-100)73.9 (71.9-75.8)63.5 (59.7-67.3)
Specificity, % (95%CI)96.783.187.7 (84.9-90.5)92.8 (81.2-100)83.4 (81.1-85.7)89.4 (85.0-93.8)
Accuracy, % (95%CI)94.389.581.9 (78.9-84.8)93.6 (89.1-98.1)79.4 (78.3-80.5)78.5 (76.6-80.4)
PPV, % (95%CI)95.380.881.7 (78.0-85.5)91.4 (78.0-100)76.5 (74.2-78.8)82.2 (76.1-88.2)
NPV, % (95%CI)93.698.782.7 (79.2-86.3)96.4 (90.1-100)81.5 (80.5-82.4)77.2 (75.8-78.6)