Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2021; 27(29): 4802-4817
Published online Aug 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i29.4802
Published online Aug 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i29.4802
Ref. | Study design | Algorithm type | Dataset | Results |
Kuiper et al[37] | Diagnostic model development | Diagnostic performance of WavSTAT | 87 patients | Accuracy: 73.4% |
NPV: 74.4% | ||||
Rath et al[38] | Diagnostic model development | Diagnostic performance of WavSTAT for predicting polyp histology | 27 patients | Accuracy: 84.7% |
Sensitivity: 81.8% | ||||
Specificity: 85.2% | ||||
NPV: 96.1% | ||||
Min et al[39] | Randomized controlled trial | Linked color imaging with laser endoscopic system vs WL | 141 patients from 3 hospitals in China | Polyp detection rate of 91% in the LCI group, 73% in the WL group, P < 0.0001 |
- Citation: Joseph J, LePage EM, Cheney CP, Pawa R. Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(29): 4802-4817
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i29/4802.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i29.4802