Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2021; 27(23): 3317-3326
Published online Jun 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i23.3317
Table 1 Randomized controlled studies of fecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis
Ref.
Moayyedi et al[55]
Rossen et al[56]
Paramsothy et al[57]
Costello et al[58]
Date of publication2015201520172019
Reference number55565758
Number of patients38234138
Number of controls37254035
Severity of UCMayo 4-12 (mild to severe)SCCAI 4-11 (mild to moderate)Mayo 4-10 (mild to moderate)Mayo 3-10 (mild to moderate)
Donor and Donor stool6 volunteers15 donorsMulti-donorsMulti-donors
fresh or frozenfresh(3-7 donors), frozen(3-4 donors), frozen
Mode of FMTRetention enemaNasoduodenal tubeColonoscopy and enemaColonoscopy and enema
Number of FMT62413
1/wk × 6 wk0 and 3 wkFirst infusion by colonoscopy + 5/wk for 8 wk by enema3/wk (colonoscopy followed by 2 enemas)
Follow-up6 wk12 wk8 wk8 wk
Pretreatment with antibioticsNoNoNoNo
Primary endpointRemission (Mayo ≤ 2 with an endoscopic score of 0)Remission (SCCAI ≤ 2) combined with ≥ 1-point decrease in Mayo endoscopic scoreSteroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic remission or response (Mayo ≤ 2, all subscores ≤ 1, and ≥ 1-point reduction in endoscopy subscore)Steroid-free remission with endoscopic remission (Mayo ≤ 2 with endoscopic subscore ≤ 1)
Subjects who achieved the primary endpoint9/38 (24%) treated with FMT vs 2/37 (5%) control (P = 0.03)7/23 (30.4%) treated with FMT vs 5/25 (20.0%) control (P = 0.51)11/41 (27%) treated with FMT vs 3/40 (8%) control (P = 0.021)12/38 (32%) treated with FMT vs 3/35 (9%) control (P = 0.03)