Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2021; 27(16): 1828-1840
Published online Apr 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i16.1828
Table 3 Synthetic presentation of data on combined marker performance in detecting mucosal healing
Ref.
Study type
Investigated marker
MH definition
CU/CD
Number of patients
AUC
95%CI
Sn (%)
Sp (%)
Cutoff level
Reinisch et al[43]Post hoc analysis of clinical trialFC, CRP and CDAICDEIS < 4CD2440.68,0.62-0.747464FC < 250 mcg/g, CRP < 5 mg/L, and CDAI < 150
D'Haens et al[41]Prospective-specimen collection, retrospective–blinded-evaluationEHISES-CD of ≤ 2 and ≤ 1 in each segmentCD311 in 2 cohorts (116 + 195)0.962; 0.6930.942-0.982; 0.619-0.76797.1; 83.2 (for cutoff of 20)100; 87.8 (cutoff of 50)≤ 20
Gubatan et al[42]Prospective cohortIL-4 + IL-10/IL-17A + TNF-αGeboes Histologic Grade of < 3CU700.64152.6750.1522
Mavropoulou et al[44]Prospective cohortsIL-2R (CU); IL-6 (CD); FC (UC); FC (CD)MES = 0-1; SES-CD ≤ 3UC + CD299 (84 + 145)0.80; 0.80; 0.92; 0.840.68-0.91; 0.71-0.89; 0.86-0.99; 0.76-0.9263; 69; 91; 7085; 80; 89; 100< 646 IU/mL; < 5.5 pg/mL; 340 mg/kg; < 180 mg/kg