Effect and safety of mark-guided vs standard peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case control study

doi:10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 26, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7358)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

305

WORD

211

HTML

2886

Figures (1-3)

455

Tables (1-4)

283

Sum=4140

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1087

Download

2131

Sum=3218

Mar 7, 2020 (publication date) through Nov 8, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2020; 26(9): 973-983
Published online Mar 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow chart.

Citation: Li DF, Xiong F, Yu ZC, Zhang HY, Liu TT, Tian YH, Shi RY, Lai MG, Song Y, Xu ZL, Zhang DG, Yao J, Wang LS. Effect and safety of mark-guided vs standard peroral endoscopic myotomy: A retrospective case control study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(9): 973-983
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i9/973.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i9.973