Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2020; 26(7): 696-705
Published online Feb 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i7.696
Table 2 Proteomics in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis
ProteinSettingDiagnostic accuracyRef.
LactotransferrinUC vs HC biopsiesIt correlates to the colon inflammation grade scoreBennike et al[53], 2015
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)Sign of chronic inflammation
Granzyme B and PerforinCD Th1 and Th17 clones from intestinal mucosaHigher in Th1 vs Th17Riaz et al[58], 2016
RORC and FOXP3
Glycerol-3-phosphatedehydrogenaseUC biopsies inflamed vs non-inflamedHigher in inflamed vs non-inflamed tissuePoulsen et al[60], 2012
AlphaenolaseLower in inflamed vs non- inflamed tissue
Keratins 10, 14, 19UC intestinal epithelial cellsHigher in QUC vs HCMoriggi et al[61], 2017
Keratin 8Lower in QUC vs HC
Tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes
Oxidative phosphorylation enzymes
Vinculin and α-tubulin
Keratin 8, 18CD intestinal epithelial cellsLower in QCD vs HC
Heat shock cognate-70 (HSC70)
Vinculin and α-tubulinHigher in QCD vs HC
Fibrinopeptide A (FPA)CD serumHigher in CD vs HCNanni et al[62], 2009
Complement 3 protein (C3)
Apolipoprotein A-IV
Apolipoprotein ELower in CD vs HC
L-lactate dehydrogenaseIBD and HC intestinal epithelial cellsHigher in IBD vs HC; Higher in CD vs UCShkoda et al[63], 2007
Carbonyl reductase
Keratin 19
Rho-GDI dissociation inhibitor α
Annexin 2UC intestinal epithelial cellsHigher in UC vs HC
Programmed cell death protein 8 (PDCD8)