Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2020; 26(7): 696-705
Published online Feb 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i7.696
Table 1 Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease
MarkerSettingDiagnostic accuracyRef.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)SerumHigher in CD vs UCHenriksen et al[24], 2008
25% IBD patients have levels above normalVermeire et al[22], 2004
Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae Antibodies (ASCA)Serum39%-79% CD positivePeyrin-Biroulet et al[25], 2015;
5%-15% UC positiveReumaux et al[26], 2004
14%-18% HC positiveBennike et al[27], 2014
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)SerumDifferent pattern in CD and UCPeeters et al[31], 2001;
Peyrin-Biroulet et al[30], 2007;
Reumaux et al[29], 2003
32% HC positiveBernstein et al[32], 2011
CalprotectinColorectal mucusHigher in IBD vs HCLoktionov et al[79], 2016
Higher in UC vs CD
Calgranulin C (S100A12)Higher in UC vs CD
Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN)Higher in IBD vs HC
Higher in UC vs CD
Fecal calprotectin (FC)StoolIt correlates with disease activity in adultsGisbert et al[35], 2009
LactoferrinStoolIt distinguishes IBD from IBSBennike et al[27], 2014