Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2020; 26(6): 657-669
Published online Feb 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i6.657
Table 1 Summary of the prognostic scoring systems (points)
Prognostic systemConstituentsRisk stratificationCandidates
HAPAlbumin < 36 g/L1HAP A0Yes
AFP > 400 ng/mL1HAP B1
Tumor diameter > 7 cm1HAP C2No
Bilirubin > 17 μmol/L1HAP D3-4
mHAPAlbumin < 36 g/L1mHAP A0Yes
AFP > 400 ng/dL1mHAP B1
Tumor diameter > 7 cm1mHAP C2No
mHAP D3
mHAP2Albumin < 36 g/L1mHAP2 A0Yes
AFP > 400 ng/mL1mHAP2 B1
Tumor diameter > 7 cm1mHAP2 C2No
Tumor number ≥ 21mHAP2 D3-5
Bilirubin > 0.9 mg/dL1
mHAP3The prognostic index (PI) formula: (0.104 × size in cm) + [0.3089 × number (single nodule = 1; 2-3 nodules = 2; more than three nodules = 3)] + (0.2185 × Log10AFP in ng/mL) - (0.4049 × Albumin in g/dL) + (0.1506 × Bilirubin in mg/dL)< Median PIYes
≥ Median PINo
6&12Score = Tumor size in cm + Tumor number< Median ScoreYes
≥ Median ScoreNo
ARTAbsence of radiologic response10-1.5Yes
AST increase >25 %4
Child-Pugh increase: 1 point1.5≥ 2.5No
≥ 2 points3
ABCRPresence of radiologic response-3≤ 2Yes
AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL1
BCLC B2
BCLC C3≥ 3No
Child-Pugh increase: ≥ 2 points2

  • Citation: Wang ZX, Wang EX, Bai W, Xia DD, Mu W, Li J, Yang QY, Huang M, Xu GH, Sun JH, Li HL, Zhao H, Wu JB, Yang SF, Li JP, Li ZX, Zhang CQ, Zhu XL, Zheng YB, Wang QH, Li J, Yuan J, Li XM, Niu J, Yin ZX, Xia JL, Fan DM, Han GH, on behalf of China HCC-TACE Study Group. Validation and evaluation of clinical prediction systems for first and repeated transarterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A Chinese multicenter retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(6): 657-669
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i6/657.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i6.657