Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2020; 26(42): 6669-6678
Published online Nov 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6669
Published online Nov 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6669
Table 3 Comparison of clinical results according to evaluation groups
Group | A | B | C | D | P value1 |
Evaluation 1: Visual observation | Correct | Correct | Incorrect | Incorrect | |
Evaluation 2: CDE | Correct | Incorrect | Correct | Incorrect | |
n | 35 | 1 | 13 | 3 | |
Age | 59.4 (21.4) | 76 | 56.3 (23.3) | 67.3 (6.0) | 0.568 |
Male | 20 | 0 | 9 | 3 | |
Insertion time [minutes, mean (SD)] | 16.9 (14.9)2 | 90 | 25.5 (22.3) | 68.3 (45.0) | 0.008 |
Incisor tooth to branch [minutes, mean (SD)] | 4.8 (4.1) | 20 | 8.5 (7.7) | 16.6 (12.3) | 0.042 |
Branch- target [minutes, mean (SD)] | 12.0 (13.2)3 | 70 | 17.0 (18.1) | 52.6 (32.5) | 0.014 |
Total examination time [minutes, mean (SD)] | 62.9 (26.6) | 165 | 73.0 (33.9) | 82.0 (33) | 0.229 |
Treatment, n | 26 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
Baseline CRP (mg/dL, mean (SD)) | 2.2 (4.0) | 3.5 | 2.6 (2.7) | 0.10 (0.11) | |
Baseline serum amylase [IU/L, mean (SD)] | 175 (220) | 793 | 138 (100) | 118 (58) |
- Citation: Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Kawashima H, Yamamura T, Maeda K, Sawada T, Mizutani Y, Ishikawa E, Ishikawa T, Kakushima N, Furukawa K, Ohno E, Honda T, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Accuracy of carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using double-balloon endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(42): 6669-6678
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i42/6669.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i42.6669