Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Table 6 Summary of the results of Deek’s test for publication bias of each category for the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team classification and the Pit pattern classification corresponding to histological diagnosis in the included studies
| JNET (type) | n of study | Pubbias (P value) | Pit pattern (type) | No. of study | Pubbias (P value) |
| Type 1 | 8 | 0.26 | II | 5 | 0.54 |
| Type 2A | 10 | 0.62 | IIIL + IV | 10 | 0.41 |
| Type 2B | 9 | 0.52 | IIIS + VI-L | 6 | 0.09 |
| Type 3 | 9 | 0.50 | VN + VI-H | 8 | 0.91 |
| Non-neoplastic | 8 | 0.26 | Non-neoplastic | 23 | 0.13 |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Chen HY, Zhou XL, Pan WS, Zhou XX, Pan HH. Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i40/6279.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279