Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Classification | Type | P value | ||||||
Prodesign | Sampsize | Qscore | Endoscopy | Category | Country | Pubyear | ||
JNET | Type 1 | 0.26 | 0.63 | 0.06 | ||||
Type 2A | 0.88 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.00 | ||||
Type 2B | ||||||||
Type 3 | 0.57 | 0.12 | 0.19 | |||||
Pit pattern | II | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.00 | ||
IIIL + IV | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.09 | |
IIIS + VI-L | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.02 | |
VN + VI-H | ||||||||
Non-neoplastic | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.04 | 0.52 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Chen HY, Zhou XL, Pan WS, Zhou XX, Pan HH. Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i40/6279.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279