Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Table 4 Summary of the results of Spearman’s correlation coefficient of each category for the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team classification and the Pit pattern classification corresponding to histological diagnosis in the included studies
| JNET (type) | Coef | P value | Pit pattern (type) | Coef | P value |
| Non-neoplastic | -0.12 | 0.02 | |||
| Type 1 (Non-neoplastic) | 0.14 | 0.02 | II | 0.45 | 0.20 |
| Type 2A | -0.70 | 0.49 | IIIL + IV | -0.24 | 0.06 |
| Type 2B | -1.00 | 1.00 | IIIS + VI-L | 0.41 | 0.17 |
| Type 3 | -0.17 | 0.03 | VN + VI-H | 1.00 | 1.00 |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Chen HY, Zhou XL, Pan WS, Zhou XX, Pan HH. Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i40/6279.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279