Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2020; 26(39): 5919-5943
Published online Oct 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.5919
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of imaging studies for fibrosis assessment methods from studies made in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
PopulationRef.CutoffsSeSpPPVNPVAUROC
TE [LSM (kPA)]n = 291[85]≥ 8.2 kPa AF90%61%NANA0.870
≥ 12.5 kPa AF57%90%NANANA
452[56]≥ 8.7 kPa AF88%63%59%90%0.831
142[77]≥ 11.7 kPa AF86%84%75%92%0.880
79[83]≥ 9.5 kPa AF92%63%54%94%NA
MRE [LSM (kPA)]142[77]≥ 4.8 kPa AF74%87%74%81%0.890
628[63]≥ 3.6 kPa AF86%91%71%93%NA
117[97]≥ 3.63 kPa AF81%89%68%97%NA
142[98]≥ 4.15 kPa AF85%92%NANA0.954
102[99]> 3.64 kPa AF92%90%NANA0.957
ARFI [SWV (m/s)]291[85]≥ 1.15 AF90%63%NANA0.840
≥ 1.53 AF59%90%NANANA
57[90]≥ 1.45 AF76%68%NANA0.910
32[91]≥ 1.3 AF85%83%NANANA
23≥ 1.47 AF100%75%NANA0.942
NASH[92]
54[93]≥ 1.77 AF100%91%NANA0.930