Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2020; 26(36): 5408-5419
Published online Sep 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i36.5408
Table 1 Applications of artificial intelligence in endoscopy based on different study population
Ref.YearCountry/regionNumber of casesStudy populationMethodsResults
Liu et al[7]2016China400 imagesHospitalJDPCAAUCs (0.9532), accuracy (90.75%)
Ali et al[8]2018Pakistan176 imagesPublic images datasetG2LCMAUC (0.91), accuracy (87%)
Luo et al[9]2019China1036496 imagesHospitalGRAIDSAccuracy (up to 97.7%)
Sakai et al[10]2018Japan29037 imagesHospitalCNNAccuracy (87.6%)
Yoon et al[11]2019South Korea11539 imagesHospitalVGG modelAUCs (0.981 for detection), AUCs (0.851 for depth prediction)
Nakahira et al[12]2019Japan107284 imagesCancer InstituteDeep neural networkKappa value (0.27)
Zhu et al[13]2019China993 imagesHospitalCNN-CAD systemAUCs (0.94), accuracy (89.16%)
Wang et al[14]2019China104864 imagesHospitalMCNNSensitivity (79.622%), specificity (78.48%)
Guimarães et al[15]2020Germany270 imagesMedical centerDLAUCs (0.98), accuracy (93%)
Miyaki et al[16]2015Japan100 casesHospitalSVMAverage output value (0.846 ± 0.220)
Liu et al[17]2018China1120 M-NBI images/3068 imagesHospitalDeep CNNTop accuracy (98.5%)
Horiuchi et al[18]2019Japan2828 imagesHospitalCNNAccuracy (85.3%)
Li et al[19]2019China2088 imagesHospitalCNNAccuracy (90.91%)
Bergholt et al[20]2011Singapore1063 in vivo Raman spectraHospitalACO-LDA algorithmsSensitivity (94.6%), specificity (94.6%)
Duraipandian et al[21]2012Singapore2748 in vivo Raman spectraHospitalPLS-DA algorithmsAccuracy (85.6%), specificity (86.2%)