Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2020; 26(34): 5207-5219
Published online Sep 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i34.5207
Published online Sep 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i34.5207
Table 2 Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of per oral pancreatoscopy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy
POP (%) | EHL (%) | LL (%) | |
Technical success | 76.4 (95%CI: 65.9-84.5; I2 = 64%) | 70.3 (95%CI: 57.8-80.3; I2 = 36%) | 89.3 (95%CI: 70.5-96.7; I2 = 70%) |
Clinical success | 76.8 (95%CI: 65.2-85.4; I2 = 66%) | 66.5 (95%CI: 55.2-76.2; I2 = 19%) | 88.2 (95%CI: 66.4-96.6; I2 = 77%) |
All adverse events | 14.9 (95%CI: 9.2-23.2; I2 = 49%) | 11.2 (95%CI: 5.9-20.3; I2 = 15%) | 13.1 (95%CI: 6.3-25.4; I2 = 31%) |
PEP | 7.0 (95%CI: 3.5-13.6; I2 = 38%) | -- | -- |
Fever | 3.7 (95%CI: 2-6.9; I2 = 0) | -- | -- |
Abdominal pain | 4.7 (95%CI: 2.7-7.8; I2 = 0) | -- | -- |
Perforation | 4.3 (95%CI: 2.1-8.4; I2 = 0) | -- | -- |
Hemorrhage | 3.4 (95%CI: 1.7-6.6; I2 = 0) | -- | -- |
- Citation: Saghir SM, Mashiana HS, Mohan BP, Dhindsa BS, Dhaliwal A, Chandan S, Bhogal N, Bhat I, Singh S, Adler DG. Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(34): 5207-5219
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i34/5207.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i34.5207