Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2020; 26(34): 5207-5219
Published online Sep 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i34.5207
Table 2 Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of per oral pancreatoscopy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy
POP (%)EHL (%)LL (%)
Technical success76.4 (95%CI: 65.9-84.5; I2 = 64%)70.3 (95%CI: 57.8-80.3; I2 = 36%)89.3 (95%CI: 70.5-96.7; I2 = 70%)
Clinical success76.8 (95%CI: 65.2-85.4; I2 = 66%)66.5 (95%CI: 55.2-76.2; I2 = 19%)88.2 (95%CI: 66.4-96.6; I2 = 77%)
All adverse events14.9 (95%CI: 9.2-23.2; I2 = 49%)11.2 (95%CI: 5.9-20.3; I2 = 15%)13.1 (95%CI: 6.3-25.4; I2 = 31%)
PEP7.0 (95%CI: 3.5-13.6; I2 = 38%)----
Fever3.7 (95%CI: 2-6.9; I2 = 0)----
Abdominal pain4.7 (95%CI: 2.7-7.8; I2 = 0)----
Perforation4.3 (95%CI: 2.1-8.4; I2 = 0)----
Hemorrhage3.4 (95%CI: 1.7-6.6; I2 = 0)----