Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2020; 26(26): 3720-3736
Published online Jul 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i26.3720
Published online Jul 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i26.3720
No | Time | Patients (n) | Samples(n) | Methods | Findings | Ref. |
Studies on cancer cells | ||||||
1 | 2001 | 11 | 29 T + 11 N | IHC and TP53/CTNNB1 sequencing | Heterogeneity existed in small HCC, accompanied by increased proliferative activity. | [68] |
2 | 2015 | 23 | 120 T | IHC and TP53/CTNNB1 sequencing | Intratumor heterogeneity may contribute to treatment failure and drug resistance in many cases of HCC. | [67] |
3 | 2015 | 1 | 286 T | WES/Genotyping | 20 unique cell clones were defined by WES. The size distribution of the clones revealed a non-Darwinian evolution model. | [69] |
4 | 2016 | 1 | 8 HCC + 3 ICC +N | WES | IM showed similarity to a primary nodule and indicated that it could be an early event in HCC. | [60] |
5 | 2016 | 10 | 43 T + 10 N | WGS/WES | Ubiquitous mutations ranged from 8% to over90%. Satellite nodules occurred late in HCC. | [57] |
6 | 2017 | 11 | 52 T + 6 N + 11 B | WES + DNA methylation | 29% of putative driver mutations were present in the branches. DNA methylation heterogeneity was largely driven by the cancer self. | [61] |
7 | 2017 | 9 | 51 T + 9 N | WGS/WES | Tumor physically closer tend to be genetically more similar. HCC arose from ancestral clones and genetic lineages diverged as tumor grew. | [59] |
8 | 2017 | 23 | 49 T | WGS + RNA-seq | Genetic diagnosis is good for an effective choice of therapeutic strategy and IM/MC determination. | [58] |
9 | 2017 | 59 | 31 N + 120 T | TDS | Trunk events in early stages (TERT, TP53, and CTNNB1 mutations) were ubiquitous across different regions. | [63] |
10 | 2017 | 5 | 32 T + 5 N + cfDNA | WES + TDS | Single region TDS identified 70% of the total mutations, while the cfDNA covered 47.2% of total. | [116] |
11 | 2017 | 10 | 55 T | WES | 53.8% of oncogenic alterations varied among subclones. Targetable alterations were identified in subregions from 4 HCCs. | [121] |
12 | 2018 | 5 | 15 T + 5 N | Proteomics | Diagnostic outcome may drastically differ if different sectors of tumor are analyzed. | [73] |
13 | 2019 | 6 | 34 T + 5 N | WES + RNA-seq | Largest tumor contained higher proportion of ancestral clones. RNA expression pattern was associated with E-S grade | [62] |
14 | 2019 | 5 | 36 | WES + RNA-seq + proteomics + metabolomics + CyTOF | Comprehensive intratumoral heterogeneity exists in all dimensions, and the novel immunoclassification of HCC facilitates prognostic prediction and may guide therapy. | [72] |
15 | 2019 | 113 | 356 (T + N) | WGS/WES/TDS + DNA methylation | Intratumoral heterogeneity revealed interactions between genomic and epigenomic features associated with tumor progression and recurrence. | [65] |
16 | 2019 | 88 | 230 T | IHC and TERT promoter sequencing | Distinct marker expression in different nodules. Limited heterogeneity in metastasis compared to primary sites. | [83] |
Studies on immune cells | ||||||
17 | 2018 | 124 | 919 T | Multiplex IHC | Varying degrees of intratumor heterogeneity of the immune microenvironment were observed. | [74] |
18 | 2019 | 13 | 79 T | IHC + RNA-seq | A single-region sample might be reliable for the evaluation of tumor immune infiltration in approximately 60%-70% of patients with HCC. | [117] |
19 | 2019 | 15 | 47 T | WES + RNA-seq + TCR-seq + IHC + immunopeptidomes | Genetic structure, neoepitope landscape, T cell profile and immunoediting status collectively shape tumor evolution. | [79] |
20 | 2020 | 14 | 51 T + 20 N | WES + RNA-seq + TCR-seq + SNP array + immunofluorescence | The different components of the tumor ecosystem interact during cancer evolution, and promote heterogeneity in liver cancer. | [64] |
- Citation: Zhang Q, Lou Y, Bai XL, Liang TB. Intratumoral heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma: From single-cell to population-based studies. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(26): 3720-3736
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i26/3720.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i26.3720