Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2020; 26(23): 3293-3303
Published online Jun 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293
Published online Jun 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293
Table 2 Summary of the consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage after two rounds
Category | Consensus |
Clinical parameters | Tachycardia, clinical deterioration, abdominal pain, discharge from abdominal drain, discharge from rectum, rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic defect found by digital examination contribute to the suspicion of CAL |
Laboratory tests | CRP and the combination of CRP and leukocytosis contribute to the suspicion of CAL; Albumin, urea and creatinine do not contribute to the suspicion of CAL |
Radiological findings | Extravasation of endoluminal administrated contrast, collection around the anastomosis, presacral abscess near anastomosis, perianastomotic air and free intra-abdominal air are defined as CAL on CT-scan |
Findings during reoperation | Necrosis of anastomosis, necrosis of blind loop, signs of peritonitis and dehiscence of anastomosis are defined as CAL during reoperation |
Grading systems | Grading or classifying CAL is important; Both the ISREC-classification and Clavien-Dindo classification are suitable |
Timing | Distinction between early and late anastomosis should be made; There should not be a fixed range of days in which CAL can occur to define it as CAL |
Colon/rectum | Colon and rectum should be seen as separate entities |
- Citation: van Helsdingen CP, Jongen AC, de Jonge WJ, Bouvy ND, Derikx JP. Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(23): 3293-3303
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i23/3293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293