Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2020; 26(20): 2464-2471
Published online May 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2464
Published online May 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2464
Basic considerations for PEG implantation | |
Is oral nutrition - for whatever reason - so inadequate that intervention is justified? | |
Is enteral nutrition likely to be necessary for at least 3 wk? | |
Is the intestine distal to the access path functional? | |
Are risk factors for complications absent? | |
Is the anatomy suitable for PEG? | |
Is compliance sufficient for PEG handling (feeding in (half) upright position, infection prophylaxis, mobilization of the PEG tube, etc.)? | |
Typical access types | |
Pull-PEG (Ponsky-Gauderer) | After diaphanoscopy, primary puncture with a trocar followed by pulling the tube with a thread through the esophagus |
Push-/Introducer-PEG (Russell) | With diaphanoscopy, primary gastropexy followed by direct introduction of a balloon-fixed tube |
- Citation: Dietrich CG, Schoppmeyer K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(20): 2464-2471
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i20/2464.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2464