Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2020; 26(2): 246-265
Published online Jan 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i2.246
Table 4 Summary of finding table based on a hypothetical scenario[38] of applying glycoprotein 2 antibodies tests on a cohort of 10000 patients
AnalysisDiagnostic cut-off (U/dL)TP(Range)FP(Range)TN(Range)FN(Range)
CD vs All symptomatic patients (IgG)Mixed9(6-21)698927023(21-26)
207(5-10)698(498-897)9270(9071-9470)25(22-27)
159(5-14)797(399-1,595)9171(8373-9569)23(18-27)
CD vs UC (IgG)Mixed10(8-12)698927022(20-24)
208(5-11)698(399-997)9270(8971-9569)24(21-27)
159(5-14)997(598-1595)8971(8373-9370)23(18-27)
CD vs All symptomatic patients (IgA)Mixed5(4-6)299966927(26-28)
205(3-8)399(100-1396)9569(8572-9868)27(24-29)
CD vs UC (IgA)Mixed4(1-6)199976928(26-31)
205(3-7)199(100-399)9769(9569-9868)27(25-27)
CD vs All symptomatic patients (IgA and/or IgG)Mixed6(3-9)299966926(20-23)
207(4-12)698(199-1994)9270(7974-9769)25(20-28)
CD vs UC (IgA and/or IgG)Mixed6(1-11)299966926(21-31)