Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Univariate | Multivariate | |||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Age | 1.02 (1.00-1.03) | 0.011 | 1.02 (1.00-1.03) | 0.012 |
Female sex | 0.93 (0.69-1.25) | 0.636 | ||
BMI | 0.96 (0.92-1.00) | 0.068 | ||
Tumor location | ||||
Upper 1/3 | Ref. | |||
Mid 1/3 | 2.32 (0.32-16.77) | 0.403 | ||
Lower 1/3 | 2.35 (0.33-16.76) | 0.395 | ||
Reconstruction | ||||
Billroth I | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Billroth II | 1.90 (1.37-2.64) | < 0.001 | 1.50 (1.08-2.10) | 0.016 |
RYGJ | 1.87 (1.31-2.67) | 0.001 | 1.72 (1.20-2.47) | 0.003 |
Tumor size | 1.16 (1.10-1.21) | < 0.001 | ||
Borrmann type IV | 1.04 (0.46-2.33) | 0.931 | ||
CLN | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.91 | ||
T stage | ||||
T2 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
T3 | 2.61 (1.72-3.96) | < 0.001 | 1.92 (1.25-2.95) | 0.003 |
T4 | 6.17 (4.08-9.34) | < 0.001 | 3.42 (2.21-5.31) | < 0.001 |
N stage | ||||
N0 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
N1 | 1.23 (0.75-2.03) | 0.415 | 1.03 (0.62-1.70) | 0.92 |
N2 | 3.42 (2.26-5.19) | < 0.001 | 2.55 (1.67-3.89) | < 0.001 |
N3 | 5.75 (3.92-8.42) | < 0.001 | 3.88 (2.59-5.80) | < 0.001 |
Diffuse type histology | 1.19 (0.91-1.57) | 0.206 | 1.05 (0.79-1.39) | 0.758 |
LVi | 2.29 (1.73-3.02) | < 0.001 | ||
PNi | 1.63 (1.25-2.12) | < 0.001 | ||
PRM (cm) | ||||
0-1.0 | Ref. | |||
1.1-3.0 | 1.03 (0.37-2.86) | 0.949 | ||
3.1-5.0 | 0.78 (0.29-2.15) | 0.633 | ||
> 5.0 | 0.84 (0.31-2.29) | 0.734 |
- Citation: Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i18/2232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232