Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Univariate | Multivariate | |||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Age | 1.04 (1.03-1.05) | < 0.001 | 1.04 (1.03-1.05) | < 0.001 |
Female sex | 0.89 (0.69-1.15) | 0.367 | ||
BMI | 0.94 (0.90-0.98) | 0.002 | ||
Tumor location | ||||
Upper 1/3 | Ref. | |||
Mid 1/3 | 3.11 (0.43-22.4) | 0.260 | ||
Lower 1/3 | 3.54 (0.50-25.2) | 0.208 | ||
Reconstruction | ||||
Billroth I | Ref. | Ref. | ||
Billroth II | 1.66 (1.26-2.20) | < 0.001 | 1.40 (1.04-1.87) | 0.025 |
RYGJ | 1.34 (0.96-1.86) | 0.083 | 1.45 (1.04-2.03) | 0.030 |
Tumor size | 1.11 (1.06-1.16) | < 0.001 | ||
Borrmann type IV | 0.96 (0.48-1.94) | 0.914 | ||
CLN | 0.99 (0.98-1.00) | 0.045 | 0.99 (0.98-1.00) | 0.034 |
T stage | ||||
T2 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
T3 | 1.36 (1.01-1.83) | 0.044 | 1.08 (0.79-1.48) | 0.612 |
T4 | 3.02 (2.24-4.06) | < 0.001 | 1.90 (1.38-2.62) | < 0.001 |
N stage | ||||
N0 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
N1 | 1.07 (0.73-1.56) | 0.739 | 0.92 (0.63-1.36) | 0.686 |
N2 | 2.33 (1.67-3.25) | < 0.001 | 2.06 (1.46-2.90) | < 0.001 |
N3 | 3.74 (2.77-5.05) | < 0.001 | 3.10 (2.25-4.28) | < 0.001 |
Diffuse type histology | 1.00 (0.79-1.25) | 0.967 | ||
LVi | 1.82 (1.44-2.29) | < 0.001 | ||
PNi | 1.32 (1.06-1.66) | 0.015 | ||
PRM (cm) | ||||
0-1.0 | Ref. | |||
1.1-3.0 | 0.57 (0.27-1.19) | 0.134 | ||
3.1-5.0 | 0.59 (0.29-1.23) | 0.162 | ||
> 5.0 | 0.61 (0.30-1.25) | 0.175 |
- Citation: Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i18/2232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232