Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2020; 26(16): 1962-1970
Published online Apr 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962
Published online Apr 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962
Table 1 Patient characteristics and withdrawal times in the standard forward view and retroflected view arm
| SFV arm | RFV arm | |||
| Patients, n (m/f) | 88 (39/49) | 88 (37/51) | ||
| Age, yr | ||||
| mean | 59.3 ± 15.2 | 59.9 ± 15.6 | ||
| range | 18-86 | 20-88 | ||
| Withdrawal time (min) | 1st SFV | 2nd SFV | 1st RFV | 2nd RFV |
| Cecum & ascending colon | 1:51 (1:05-2:27) | 1:47 (0:42-2:25) | 1:53 (1:27-2:17) | 1:52 (0:50-2:17) |
| Transverse colon | 1:46 (0:59-2:54) | 1:49 (1:05-2:41) | 1:50 (1:20-2:50) | 1:44 (0:30-2:49) |
| Descending & sigmoid colon | 2:36 (1:58-4:22) | 2:30 (1:00-3:41) | 2:23 (1:23-2:54) | 2:29 (1:31-2:59) |
- Citation: Rath T, Pfeifer L, Neufert C, Kremer A, Leppkes M, Hoffman A, Neurath MF, Zopf S. Retrograde inspection vs standard forward view for the detection of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy: A back-to-back randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(16): 1962-1970
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i16/1962.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962