Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2020; 26(16): 1847-1860
Published online Apr 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847
Published online Apr 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847
Ref. | Randomized patients | Treated patients | Type of stent | Surgical technique | Main outcome measures | Technical success | Clinical success | Adverse events | Hospital stay (d, median) | Reintervention | Follow-up |
Fiori et al[58], 2004 | Stent group: 9 | 9 | Covered SEMS (Ultraflex, Boston) | Open GJ | Gastric emptying (after 15 d) | 9/9 (100%) | 9/9 (100%) | 2/9 (22.2%) | 3.1 | 7/9 (77.7%) | 3 mo |
Surgery group: 9 | 9 | 9/9 (100%) | 8/9 (88.9%) | 2/9 (22.2%) | 10 | 1/9 (11.1%) | |||||
Mehta et al[59], 2006 | Stent group: 13 | 12 | Wallstent (Boston)1 | Laparoscopic GJ | Safety quality of life | 10/12 (83.3%) | Significant improvement in Physical Health score after 1 mo in duodenal stent group | 0/10 (0%) | 5.2 | NA | 12 mo |
Surgery group: 14 | 13 | 13/13 (100%) | 10/13 (76.9%) | 11.4 | |||||||
Jeurnink et al[57], 2010 | Stent group: 21 | 20 | Wallflex (Boston) | Laparoscopic or open GJ | GOOSS improvement | 20/21 (95.2%) | 17/21 (80.9%) | 8/21 (38.1%) | 7 | 2/21 (9.5%) | Median survival: 72 d (GJ) vs 50 d (SEMS) |
17/18 (94.4%) | 14/18 (77.7%) | 5/21 (23.8%) | 15 | 7/182 (38.8%) | |||||||
Surgery group: 18 | 17 |
- Citation: Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Blanco GDV, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(16): 1847-1860
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i16/1847.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847