Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2020; 26(14): 1628-1637
Published online Apr 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i14.1628
Published online Apr 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i14.1628
Recovery (n = 16) | Death (n = 10) | P value | |
Age [median (range)] | 86 (56-92) | 84 (72-99) | P > 0.9991 |
Gender (M:F) | 4:12 | 4:6 | P = 0.6652 |
Shock (≤ systolic BP 90 mmHg) (%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (60%) | P = 0.0012 |
Peritoneal irritation (%) | 2 (13%) | 8 (80%) | P = 0.0012 |
Ascites (%) | 5 (31%) | 8 (80%) | P = 0.0412 |
Intestinal pneumatosis (%) | 8 (50%) | 7 (70%) | P = 0.4282 |
WBC (/μL) [median (range)] | 9050 (4200-31800) | 13400 (9900-19000) | P = 0.0251 |
CRP (mg/dL) [median (range)] | 2.39 (0.11-28.41) | 12.84 (0.1-33.26) | P = 0.3551 |
BE (mmol/L) [median (range)] | 1.8 (-8.4 – 14.6) | -6.2 (-18.2 – 6.8) | P = 0.0711 |
Lactate (mg/dL) [median (range)] | 26 (9-63) | 36 (11-120) | P = 0.2311 |
- Citation: Gonda M, Osuga T, Ikura Y, Hasegawa K, Kawasaki K, Nakashima T. Optimal treatment strategies for hepatic portal venous gas: A retrospective assessment. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(14): 1628-1637
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i14/1628.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i14.1628