Big-data analysis: A clinical pathway on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones

doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.1002

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 25, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8759)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

496

WORD

390

HTML

4496

Figures (1-1)

245

Tables (1-5)

227

Sum=5854

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

868

Download

2037

Sum=2905

Feb 28, 2019 (publication date) through Nov 4, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (10)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2019; 25(8): 1002-1011
Published online Feb 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.1002

Table 2 Comparison of length of hospital stay, clinical outcomes, hospital charges, and drug use between the non-pathway and clinical pathway groups

Characteristic	Non-pathway group (n = 467)	Cinical pathway group (n = 2196)	P value
Length of total hospital stay (median, range)	8 (6-11)	7 (5-9)	< 0.001^a
Pre-operative length of stay	2 (1-4)	2 (1-3)	0.451
Readmission, n (%)	34 (7.28)	173 (7.88)	0.661
Clinical outcomes, n (%)			0.115
Recovered	223 (47.75)	1146 (52.19)
Improved	236 (50.54)	1028 (46.81)
Not improved	8 (1.71)	22 (1)
Died	0	0
Charges of hospitalization (CNY), (median, range) n = 467/2183	21508.3 (17150.6-30045.8)	18362.9 (15665.8-22895.2)	< 0.001^a
Charges of medication, n = 459/2153	6620.6 (3429.4-12239.7)	4900.6 (3172.4-8186.0)	< 0.001^a
Charges of operation, n = 458/2151	5741.0 (4519.2-7324.0)	5455.2 (2670.0-6964.0)	< 0.001^a
Charges of nursing, n = 454/2133	188.0 (115.0-288.0)	120.0 (74.0-211.0)	< 0.001^a
Charges of materials, n = 409/1540	7916.4 (6696.0-10552.6)	6985.5 (6135.1-8224.7)	< 0.001^a
Charges of examination, n = 459/2153	2698.0 (2224.5-3799.5)	2463.5 (2134.5-3105.5)	< 0.001^a
Antibiotic use, n (%)	260/430 (60.47)	832/1737 (47.90)	< 0.001^a
Antibiotic usage duration (d) (median, range), n = 260/832	12 (8.0-18.5)	11 (7.0-17.0)	0.004^a
Three line antibiotic use, n (%)	51/430 (11.86)	149/1737 (8.58)	0.035^a
Secondary surgery, n (%)	69 (14.78)	372 (16.94)	0.253

^aP < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Citation: Zhang W, Wang BY, Du XY, Fang WW, Wu H, Wang L, Zhuge YZ, Zou XP. Big-data analysis: A clinical pathway on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(8): 1002-1011
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i8/1002.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.1002